I had an absolutely excellent SEO experience today. In my role as adviser to a financial institution here in Sweden, I again got the opportunity to meet with, and judge SEO firms and their offers. One of these meetings was like a throw-back to my experience in the US four years ago.
Basically, this was the pitch: payment only as a result of performance, no on-site modifications, and our domain will rank. This deal sounds pretty good, right? And, according to the sales-guy, it was “completely unique”.
The reason this deal sounds good initially, is because there is very little chance that our domain will be punished by engaging in it, we will not actively be participating in a link-farming-scheme, and it does not sound like cloaking. Also, we were promised, this was not a comment-spam-linking strategy.
So far, so good.
Or is it? Not really - a few of the warning bells have already rung. First off, there is a startup fee. This means that prior to them delivering anything, a significant (if we target competitive keywords) amount of money will change hands. So the whole “pay only by performance” is, in a word, false. (The startup cost for 6 keywords of mixed competitiveness was around $25.000, and there are a whole lot of text-links available for that price if that is what we are going for.)
The whole text-link thing is also, of course, an issue. Not that I am directly hostile to grey-zone techniques in certain situations, but getting links from a large amount of sites controlled by an SEO-firm is borderline even to me. As could be expected, our request for a reference domain so we could do reverse link lookups to review the company’s linking sites was not immediately responded to.
We were told that if the “cluster of sites” from which these links would be pointed was discovered and blacklisted, we would simply get links from another of the “10 or so clusters” that the company was in control of. It was humorous to me to hear the sales guy say that there was no way of connecting the clusters to each other. There is, of course.
There is more - something that initially seemed like a good deal - a cost structure varied by placement. We would only pay full price for placement on spots 1-3. Sure, fine. But we would pay 75% of full price for spots 4-7, which of course is somewhat absurd. Firstly, there is a significant difference in effort reaching spot 7 compared to spot 3 - secondly, there is severely less traffic on spot 7 compared to spot 3. I was told that 75% was fair - I know that it is not.
Another point that was somewhat disruptive was the fact that they would claim success independent of which page on the domain placed well. Which probably will mean that they direct the majority of their links to the index page as that is the easiest to get to rank well. For my financial institution, there are such completely varied product lineups, and such little control of the index page in comparison to product pages that this would effectively be paying for failure.
If you are engaged in organic SEO work independently, that might also conflict with this type of campaign. Your success could possibly be considered their success. We can not have any of that…
For $25.000 or so, lots of fun things can happen. For that amount of money, a strong organic campaign can be built naturally, ethically, and with the long term perspective. (Because, as could be expected, if we were to stop paying for the links, the links are removed.)
The SEO business in Sweden is clearly still remarkably immature. Old fashioned linking packages sold as “unique”. High pressure salesmen selling packages with a “pay for performance only” with an up front cost. No understanding for the concept of quality - only “placements placements placements” with these people.
In regards to this particular solution, I sense that there is something else big that I am missing. No matter if I am right or wrong about that - this product would be laughed at in the US. Even four years ago. What we taught our customers then and there was that “learn how to write for the web”, we gave the technicians the tools to create a strong solid technical architecture, and we gave the press and marketing departments the tools to create a natural, honest, ethical linking network with stakeholders of all kinds.
Sounds simple, huh? I have yet to be offered anything remotely close to this in Sweden, and I have sat through probably 50 different sales pitches…
David
Recent Comments